Participants additionally were expected if they had ever engaged in many different tasks associated with lesbian, gay

Fundamental Demographic Traits and Other Background Factors

Information regarding respondents’ age, ethnicity and race, residence, location, and home structure was indeed routinely gathered by Knowledge Networks in previous questionnaires. The current study included a concern asking or perhaps a respondent ended up being presently on active army responsibility, an associate regarding the armed forces Reserves or National Guard, or perhaps a veteran that is military.

Intimate Orientation Identification

As noted formerly, all participants had reported they certainly were homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual for a previously administered KN questionnaire. The survey that is present with a screening question that asked respondents “Which of this following most readily useful defines your intimate orientation?” and provided five choices arrayed on a continuum from homosexual to heterosexual. For male participants, the choices had been (a) gay or homosexual; (b) bisexual, mostly drawn to guys; (c) bisexual, equally drawn to gents and ladies; (d) bisexual, mostly interested in women; (e) heterosexual or straight. For females, the very first reaction choice ended up being lesbian, homosexual, or homosexual, and options (b) and (d) had been transposed.

Respondents were expected how old they are once they first knew about their intimate orientation (“How old were you when you knew or decided you had been ” that isgay/lesbian/bisexual and if they first disclosed it to a different person (“How old were you the very first time you told some other person you are gay/lesbian/bisexual?”). These people were later expected whether their father or mother knew about their orientation that is sexual and if relevant, exactly how many of the siblings and brothers knew about this. In addition, employing a scale that ranged from 0 ( perhaps maybe maybe not at all off to some of them) to 7 (totally out to them all), respondents reported the level to which they had been “out of this cabinet (openly L/G/B/Q/H)” to six extra teams: (1) “other family members maybe perhaps not your immediate family members,” (2) “your current heterosexual (‘straight’) buddies,” (3) “your casual acquaintances that are heterosexual (‘straight’),” (4) “heterosexual (‘straight’) friends who you knew you work with on a daily basis (other than your boss or supervisors) before you came out,” (5) “your boss and other supervisors at work,” and (6) “the people.” A “doesn’t apply to me” reaction choice had been included for every team.

Participants also had been expected if they had ever involved with many different tasks associated with lesbian, homosexual, or bisexual dilemmas, including general general general public expressions of viewpoint (“Wore a switch, posted an indicator, or displayed a bumper sticker”); taking part in a rally, march, or demonstration; contacting a federal government official; and adding cash to a lesbian, gay, or bisexual organization or cause. This variety of concerns had been followed closely by a synchronous group of items which asked if the respondent had participated in identical activities for “a non gay problem or cause that is, one thing maybe not related primarily to homosexual males, lesbians, or bisexuals. for contrast purposes”

Political and Spiritual Participation

Information regarding participants’ political party affiliation and ideology (liberal, moderate, conservative) have been formerly gathered by Knowledge Networks. When it comes to current research, participants had been expected if they had voted within the latest (2004) presidential election and, in that case, which is why candidate. They certainly were additionally expected for information on their religious denomination, regularity of attendance at spiritual solutions through the past one year, exactly just just how guidance that is much provides inside their time to time living, and (for participants whom reported affiliation by having a spiritual denomination and any attendance at spiritual services) the level to which their congregation includes lesbian, gay, and bisexual people.

Relationships, Marriage, and Family

Participants were expected their relationship that is current status their legal marital status, and just how numerous kiddies they will have (including used kiddies and stepchildren). Participants presently in a relationship (including those that had been hitched) were expected the sex of the partner. People who had been in a relationship not hitched had been asked they would marry their partner if their state were to allow same sex marriages (this conditional clause was omitted for respondents in Massachusetts, the only state where marrying a same sex partner was legal at the time of data collection) whether they were cohabiting and the likelihood. People who are not presently in a relationship had been live pornstars expected if they would someday like to marry.